Which broad implication about WM training does the Klinberg et al study suggest?

• A. Pharmacological approaches are superior
• B. Computer-based WM interventions may reduce ADHD-related behaviors
• C. Only adults benefit from WM training
• D. The study found no practical benefits

Answer: (B)

Working memory training aimed at producing real-world change in everyday behavior. Klinberg et al. suggest that computer-based WM interventions can reduce ADHD-related behaviors, meaning the training isn’t just improving memory tasks on a desk, but may transfer to better attention, self-control, and behavior in daily life. This points to a potential non-drug option for helping manage ADHD symptoms, by strengthening the very cognitive processes that support keeping distractions in check and maintaining focus.

This interpretation keeps you from assuming pharmacological methods are superior, or that benefits only appear in adults, or that there are no practical benefits at all. Instead, it emphasizes the possibility that improving working memory through computer-based practice can yield observable behavioral improvements.